<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guilty Pleasures &#8211; Starcastle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deeperintomusic.net/blog/deep-thoughts/guilty-pleasures-starcastle-696/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deeperintomusic.net/blog/deep-thoughts/guilty-pleasures-starcastle-696/</link>
	<description>discover new music - internet radio radical mix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Weston - Mr. Deeper Into Music</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomusic.net/blog/deep-thoughts/guilty-pleasures-starcastle-696/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Weston - Mr. Deeper Into Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomusic.net/blog/?p=696#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Excellent points Bumr50.  Thanks for the contribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Bumr50.  Thanks for the contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bumr50</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomusic.net/blog/deep-thoughts/guilty-pleasures-starcastle-696/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Bumr50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomusic.net/blog/?p=696#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 35 and the term &quot;progressive rock&quot; scares a lot of the younger generation. I&#039;m not sure that they understand, as much of the music that they&#039;ve been listening to would have been &quot;progressive rock &quot; 25 years ago.

King Crimson tends to be a bit lengthy, but I&#039;d be willing to bet that more than a few of them would enjoy &#039;Yes&#039; singles. And the &quot;Genesis&quot; that they are thinking of is probably pre-Peter Gabreiel and post 1986 Phil Collins. Don&#039;t be discouraged.

I&#039;m a pretty big Floyd fan and many of our community greatly enjoy a band called &quot;Porcupine Tree.&quot; I highly suggest you give em&#039; a shot if you haven&#039;t already.

If &#039;Radiohead&#039; (especially recent) isn&#039;t prog rock, I don&#039;t know what is. And &#039;Muse&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 35 and the term &#8220;progressive rock&#8221; scares a lot of the younger generation. I&#8217;m not sure that they understand, as much of the music that they&#8217;ve been listening to would have been &#8220;progressive rock &#8221; 25 years ago.</p>
<p>King Crimson tends to be a bit lengthy, but I&#8217;d be willing to bet that more than a few of them would enjoy &#8216;Yes&#8217; singles. And the &#8220;Genesis&#8221; that they are thinking of is probably pre-Peter Gabreiel and post 1986 Phil Collins. Don&#8217;t be discouraged.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a pretty big Floyd fan and many of our community greatly enjoy a band called &#8220;Porcupine Tree.&#8221; I highly suggest you give em&#8217; a shot if you haven&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>If &#8216;Radiohead&#8217; (especially recent) isn&#8217;t prog rock, I don&#8217;t know what is. And &#8216;Muse&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

